Table
1 shows a comparison of three milk replacer feeding programs for a 100 pound
calf one week of age that is not consuming any starter. In other words, the baby calf relies on milk
replacer for all nutrients. The three
milk replacer feeding programs are a 20% protein, 20% fat (20/20) all milk,
calf milk replacer fed at 1.0 pounds/day (conventional) or 1.25 pounds/day
(increased gain). The third program uses
a high protein (28%) milk replacer fed at 2.5 pounds/day using an intensified
calf-feeding program. Using the NRC program, daily gains on calves were
predicted for each program at 0, 20, 40, and 60° F.
The
table shows that at an average temperature of 60° F, the calves gained
weight on all programs, although the calves fed the higher protein milk
replacer gain 6 times as much weight as the calves on the conventional feeding
program. When average temperatures drop
to 40° F, calves fed a conventional program do not
have enough nutrients to gain weight and the gain on the increased gain program
drops by two thirds while the calves fed the intensified program continued to
gain, but at a slightly slower rate. As
average temperatures drop to 0° F and 20°
F, calves fed the 20/20 milk replacer on either the conventional or increased
gain program either stop gaining weight or lose weight. Only the calves on the intensified feeding
program continue to gain weight, even at colder temperatures. In extreme cold temperatures where calves are
kept in cold housing, traditional milk replacer programs do not provide enough
nutrients to maintain a healthy calf.
The calf will lose weight, the immunity may be compromised and some
calves may die of starvation if they do not increase their starter consumption
dramatically. Many calves are not able
to increase their starter intake rapidly enough to compensate for the energy
shortfall. The result is that the calf
may become weakened and ultimately dies of malnutrition or starvation.
Table
1. Comparison of average daily gains
for a 100 pound calf, one week of age, fed different amounts of milk replacer
at different temperatures (Based on 2001 NRC predictions)
|
|||
Conventional
|
Increased Gain
|
Intensified
Management
|
|
Milk
replacer (protein/fat)
|
20/20
|
20/20
|
28/20
|
Pounds
powder (#/d)
|
1.0
|
1.25
|
2.50
|
Average
Temperature
|
Average Daily gain
(#/day)
|
||
60°
F
|
.39
|
.79
|
2.48
|
40°
F
|
.01
|
.26
|
2.11
|
20°
F
|
Weight loss
|
0
|
1.83
|
0°
F
|
Weight loss
|
Weight loss
|
1.56
|
What
are the options to prevent starvation of calves during cold stress? Some producers will attempt to improve the
energy status of calves during cold weather.
When average temperatures are 0° F, it will take .3
pounds of fat to prevent the calf from losing weight. However, additional fat will result in up to
.4 pounds of gain when temperatures average 20° F. Another option is to feed an additional
feeding of milk replacer. Feeding 1.5
pounds/day (in 3 feedings/day) of 20/20 milk replacer at an average temperature
of 0° F will maintain body weight and result in
gains of .30 pounds/day when
temperatures average 20° F. However, the best option for cold weather
feeding is an intensified feeding program, as it will maintain the nutrients a
calf needs to maintain body heat and continue to grow.
Some
producers will argue that an intensified feeding program is too expensive to
implement. Table 2 shows an economic
comparison of the three scenarios presented in Table 1 at 40°
F. On a cost/day basis, the conventional
program is the lowest cost at $.84/calf/day, with the higher feeding rate of
the 20/20 milk replacer costing $1.05/calf/day and the intensified management
program costing $2.70/calf/day. Purely
from a cost standpoint, the conventional program makes the most sense. However, if you factor in calf performance
and evaluate cost in terms of pounds of gain, the results reverse
themselves. With virtually no gain the
conventional program costs $84/pound of gain, the increased gain program costs
$4.04/pound of gain and the intensified feeding program costs $1.08/pound of
gain. Clearly, the returns are improved
when the nutrition of baby calves is improved.
If your calves have not performed very well this winter, consider
providing them with the nutrients they need to achieve acceptable gains.
Table
2. Economic comparison of average
daily gains for a 100-pound calf, one week of age, fed different amounts of
milk replacer at 40° F.
|
|||
Conventional
|
Increased Gain
|
Intensified
Management
|
|
Milk
replacer (protein/fat)
|
20/20
|
20/20
|
28/20
|
Pounds
powder (#/d)
|
1.0
|
1.25
|
2.50
|
Average Daily gain
(#/day)
|
.01
|
.26
|
2.11
|
Cost
($/bag)
|
42
|
42
|
54
|
Cost
($/pound)
|
.84
|
.84
|
1.08
|
Cost
($/day)
|
.84
|
1.05
|
2.70
|
Cost($/pound of
gain)
|
84
|
4.04
|
1.08
|
No comments:
Post a Comment